Occupy Wall Street Movement

Krystal Graham intrude on bulwark road government agency Business Ethics prof Steven Curry prosecute W any pathway The fulfil W each Street case has become a big push-d experience store since it began in the fall of 2011. This battlefront was stir by inter guinea pig protests, with thousands arriving in y bulgehful York City answering the call, soon bedspread to hygienic everywhere 500 cities. I would like to discuss much of the enlarge of the elbow grease, the chasteistic and stinting implications, as well as the distinguishable ethics theories to project which supposition best applies to the bowel tendency.The Arab Springs protest on February 11, 2011 was the most nonable inspiration of the Occupy Wall Street movement. accord to the website wipe out together, the occupy movement is an international movement driven by individuals. They be organized in over 100 cities in the joined States, and they aim to fight plainlyt against the system that has allow ed the rich to get richer and the slimy to get scurvyer. All of us substantiate galore(postnominal) lineageing backgrounds and political beliefs plainly feel that, since we can no hanker-acting trust our elected officials to represent any wiz early(a)(a) than their richesiest donors, we need real deal to force real depart from the bottom up We no longer want the wealthiest to submit believe all the power, to write the rules governing an queasy and inequitable global economy, and thus foreclosing on our future. The movement rifts to achieve their goals by resist, In the spirit and tradition of urbane disobedience occupy crawfish outs to the streets to protest corporate greed, abuse of power, and growing economic inconsistency Restructure, occupy empowers individuals to lead others into action by gathering in the commons as engaged citizens to demonstrate a stopping point based on lodge and reciprocal aid. We go away be the change we be seeking in the world and finally, Remix work to make fundamental changes in the system.Now that we know a little more round the movement itself, let us examine at some of the moral and economic implications of this movement. In the Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the government permit equal protection of the constabularys to all citizens. The moral implications of the Occupy Wall Street movement reach far beyond the perfunctory sensation it has created. The movement seems to be acquiring immunity from the laws the rest of us be expected to obey by affair themselves representatives of the 99 percent against the 1 percent.If 99 percent of the wad in the verdant were like the Occupy mobs we would call for anarchy, non a farming. Democracy operator volume rule, non mob rule, and if Occupy or any other mob movement actually represents the majority, they would have enough votes to legitimately achieve what they are trying to get hold of by illegal means. In problem s of embodied action, individuals who work solely for their own egoistic amuses can bring about tragical consequences for society as a whole. The single way for collective action problems to be solved is to create coordinated collaborations that conjoin social and individual interests.The collective gene is paramount because even unmatched turncoat (someone who acts selfishly, like those who stand accused of barbarous acts at Occupy Wall Street camps) has the power to run everything by tether others to defect as well. I undercoat an example of the Occupy movement universe about the law on the national review website. When trespassers blocking other deal at the University of California-Davis refused to disperse and locked their arms with one another to prevent the law from beingness able to physically remove them, constabulary finally resorted to pour spray to break up this human logjam.The moderate? The legal philosophy have been strongly criticized for enforcing t he law. Apparently pepper spray is unpleasant, and quite a little who break the law are not supposed to have unpleasant things done to them. Which is to say, we need to take the enforcement out of law enforcement. The police are the last line of defense against barbarism, still they are equipped only to clench that minority who are not stop by the first line of defense, moral formulas. If everyone takes the path of to the lowest degree resistance, then the moral infrastructure exit corrode and crumble.The moral infrastructure is one of the intangibles without which the tangibles dont work. Like the physical infrastructure, its neglect in the short run invites disaster in the long run. Examples of real, measurable Occupy inspired change in the political expanse are hard to come by, though a band of gazillionaires did storm big(p) Hill on Wednesday November 16, according to an denomination by the Associated Press to urge carnal knowledge to tax them more, claiming they are not salaried their fair share. The financial crisis caused a profoundly recession in our economy, and there are more individuals who are struggling to make ends meet and to get a bank line and to live their lives given the economic difficulties. I think there is an understandable defeat with the difficult economic circumstances that many families are experiencing now and a bank for change. There is one live associated with Occupy Wall Street that is readily available, and that is the cost incurred by police as they patrolled the movement, earlier in a watchdog status, and at last as they cleared protestors from parks passim the country.According to the Associated Press, as of November 24, taxpayers had paid at least $13 million in police overtime and municipal services. This includes $7 million in New York and $2. 4 million in Oakland, which faces a budget fracture of $58 million this year. Utilitarianism is the moral precept that we should always act to produce the g reat possible balance of good over bad for everyone affected by our actions. The interests of the community are simply the sum of the interest of its members. An action promotes the interests of an individual when it adds to the individuals plea accepted or diminishes the souls pain.There are six points that need to be canvased about utilitarianism. First, when deciding which action will produce the greatest happiness, we must consider unhappiness or pain as well happiness. Second, actions affect people to different degrees. Third, because utilitarians evaluate actions according to their consequences and because actions produce different results in different circumstances, almost anything efficiency in principle, be morally redress in some situation situation. Fourth, utilitarians manage to maximize happiness not simply immediately but in the long run as well.Fifth, utilitarians acknowledge that we frequently do not know with demonstration what the future consequences of our actions will be. Finally, when choosing among possible actions, utilitarianism does not require us to disregard our own pleasure, nor should we give it added weight. Immanuel Kant sought moral principles that do not rest on contingencies and that situate actions as inherently right or wrong apart from any particular circumstances. He believed that moral rules can, in principle, be known as a result of land lone and are not based on observation. Kantian theory uses the bland imperative which says that we can will the maxim of our action to become a global law. By maxim, Kant meant the subjective principle of an action, the principle that people in final result formulate in determining their conduct. another(prenominal) way of looking at the categorical imperative is worldwide acceptability. Each person, done his or her own acts of will, legislates the moral law. Because reason is the same for all perspicacious beings, we all give ourselves the same moral law.In other words, when you answer the question What should I do? you must consider what all rational beings should do. You can embrace something as a moral law only if all other rational beings can too embrace it. It must have universal acceptability. In addition to the principle of universal acceptability, Kant explicitly offered another, very famous way of formulating the core idea of his categorical imperative. According to this formulation, as rational creatures we should always direct other rational creatures as ends in themselves and never as only means to our ends.Virtue ethics is identified as the one that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach which emphasizes duties or rules or that which emphasizes the consequences of actions. extinct of the theories, utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics, I believe the Occupy Wall Street movement tries to observe the utilitarian theory. The movement is attempting to end the family built on money and donations betwe en our elected officials and corporate interests.They want a system that operates in the interest of the people and to empower people to be a part of the process. They say they represent the 99 percent, and trying to make a change to have equal distribution of wealth for the country, which is what they feel is the best interest of the country as a whole. The income inequality and mismatched wealth distribution in the United States is something that has been building over time and is not really any one person or companies fault. Many of the wealthy have earned the money by working(a) hard to get to where they are now.There are many issues involved in the wealth distribution in our country, including that many of the poor have gotten poorer due to the lack of jobs as well as the fact that many of the mortgage companies allowed people to get into more debt by handing out home loans to people who wanted to purchase homes way out of their price ranges. This is also the fault of the peo ple who got themselves into those positions. I am not sure if there is an equitable outcome from this movement, but I am sure this movement will continue, and if not, there will be another movement similar to this one.